Chief Justice John Roberts and Marvin Laura Horne

: The court sided with California farmers Marvin and Laura Horne, who claimed they were losing money under a program they called outdated and ineffective, according to MSNBC. They had been fined $695,000 for trying to get around it. * Supreme Court ruling spins ‘web’ of Spider-Man references* Writing for the court, Chief Justice John Roberts said the government must pay just compensation when it takes personal goods, just as when it takes land away. The justices ruled 8-1 that a 1940s-era program born out of the Great Depression is unconstitutional because it allows federal officials to seize personal property from farmers without fully compensating them, even though the goal is to benefit farmers by stabilizing market prices. Roberts rejected the government argument that the Hornes voluntarily chose to participate in the raisin market and have the option of growing different crops if they don’t like it. ‘Let them sell wine’ is probably not much more comforting to the raisin growers than similar retorts have been to others throughout history, Roberts said. The case was considered one of the most important property disputes to reach the high court since 2005, when the justices ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could use the power of eminent domain to hand private homes or businesses to developers to help stimulate economic improvement. Property rights cannot be so easily manipulated. (news.financializer.com). As reported in the news.