Supreme Court and Japan Innovation Party

final decision: Even if it is the Supreme Court that makes the final decision on the constitutionality of the legislation, the Diet would be committing a rebellion against the rule of law if it continues deliberating the bills while ignoring the red flag raised by experts as well as people view that the bills don’t have to be passed during this Diet session, according to Asahi Shimbun. The opposition Japan Innovation Party says it will propose an alternative. There is a compelling case that the package of national security bills and an international peace support bill that have been submitted to the Diet by the Cabinet of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe are unconstitutional. But the problems with the legislation are too serious to be fixed through talks between the ruling camp and an opposition party. No convincing claim of constitutionality The government wrong-headed attempt to change Japan security policy began with the Abe Cabinet decision on July 1 last year to allow the nation to exercise its right to collective self-defense. The only realistic option is to kill the bills and start debate on security policy from scratch. (news.financializer.com). As reported in the news.