getty imageslaw: Getty Imageslaw and order A New Legal Argument for Impeachment'Were the Mueller hearings a dud, or a quiet blockbuster Ten legal experts weigh in, according to MSNBC. By POLITICO MAGAZINEJuly 24, 2019Continue to article content Facebook Twitter Email Comment Print Continue to article content After three months of reading or not reading the Mueller Report but hearing very little from the man who wrote it, the American public finally got to see and hear Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify before Congress Wednesday in six-plus hours of questioning on live television. Email Sign UpBy signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. Now that Mueller's testimony is over, what's changed The Democrats may have realized they need a new political strategy to combat Trump, yet at the same time a different legal argument for impeachment emerged, and the Russia investigation now threatens to loom over Trump's postpresidency. Here are their analyses The Democrats' reliance on Mueller is the wrong approach'Jill Wine-Banks is a former assistant Watergate special prosecutor, former general counsel of the U.S. Army and former member of the Department of Defense Judicial Proceedings Panel Subcommittee on Sexual Assault in the Military, and she is an MSNBC contributor. Story Continued BelowPOLITICO Magazine asked some of the most renowned legal experts in the United States what the most important revelations were, legally and practically, and if there's anything new that the White House or Democrats must now contend with.
(news.financializer.com). As
reported in the news.
Tagged under getty imageslaw, article content topics.